Value for Money Strategy
Read our Value for Money Strategy here.
Value for Money Strategy
2026-2029
| Issue date: July 2026 | Next Update Due: Jul 2029 |
| Author Name: Andrew Cooke | Owner Name: Andrew Cooke |
| Author Title: Chief Financial Officer | Owner Title: Chief Financial Officer |
| Directorate: Finance and Procurement | Parent Document: Corporate Plan 2026-2028 |
| Approved by: Board | Date approved: 30 September 2026 |
Introduction and Purpose
This strategy sets out how One Manchester will make the best possible use of money, people and resources over the period 2026 to 2029. It supports our corporate plan by focusing on how we improve services, strengthen financial resilience and deliver better outcomes for customers, homes and communities.
At a Glance
Why this strategy matters: we need to make sure every pound we spend helps us provide better services, maintain safe and sustainable homes, and remain financially strong.
What this strategy focuses on: customer outcomes, service efficiency, better use of homes and assets, smarter investment decisions, stronger use of data and digital tools, and good financial stewardship.
How we will deliver it: through clear priorities, measurable outcomes, regular reporting, and a practical three-year delivery plan linked to the corporate plan.
How customers will see the difference: easier access to services, better communication, a stronger focus on getting things right first time, and greater openness about how we are improving services and using resources.
Our Context
One Manchester is working in a challenging environment. Costs remain high, customers rightly expect good services, and there is growing pressure to invest more in existing homes, building safety and sustainability. At the same time, we must remain financially strong so that we can continue to deliver services and invest for the future. This strategy helps us respond to that challenge in a planned and practical way.
What Value for Money Means at One Manchester
For One Manchester, value for money means providing services that are high quality, easy to access and responsive to what customers need, at a cost that is fair and sustainable. It means understanding what we spend, what difference that spending makes, and where we can do things better. It also means being clear about where more investment is needed to improve services, and where we can simplify processes, improve productivity or redesign
the way we work so that customers get a better service.
What This Means for Customers
For customers, this strategy means we will focus on the things that make the biggest difference to everyday services. That includes making services easier to access, more reliable and more responsive, listening to feedback, and being clearer about how we are using our resources. It also means making sure money is spent wisely so that homes are safe and well maintained, neighbourhoods are supported, and One Manchester remains strong enough to keep investing in services for the future.
Our Principles
This strategy will guide decision making across the organisation. We will balance cost and quality when making important spending and investment decisions. We will understand the full cost, performance and outcomes of our services so that we can challenge activities that offer poor value and focus improvement where they will make the biggest difference. We will simplify processes, reduce waste and improve productivity. We will listen to customers,
colleagues and partners when identifying opportunities to improve. We will use data, digital tools and innovation where they help us provide a better or more efficient service. We will also make sure value for money is reflected in business planning, budget setting, procurement, asset decisions, service reviews and performance reporting. These principles provide the foundation for the governance, regulatory and performance framework set out in the next section.
Governance, Assurance and Regulatory Alignment
This strategy supports compliance with the Regulator of Social Housing Value for Money Standard by setting out how One Manchester will achieve economy, efficiency and effectiveness in the use of its resources. It will be supported by Board oversight, an annual value for money self-assessment, regular review of performance against sector measures, and close links to the corporate planning and budget process. We will also use benchmarking and comparison with others to understand how we are performing and where we need to improve. Section 4A explains how the core RSH value for money metrics
will be aligned to the Board-approved business plan and used to support financial and strategic assurance.
RSH Value for Money Metrics and Alignment to the Board-Approved Business Plan
The Board-approved business plan refresh from March 2026 reaffirmed the need for One Manchester to maintain financial resilience while delivering major investment in existing homes, a reduced but still significant development programme, and a cumulative efficiency requirement linked to cost pressures such as Awaab’s Law. It also confirmed the need for ongoing Board oversight of operating surplus, covenant headroom, liquidity, investment affordability and delivery of planned efficiencies. The Regulator of Social Housing value for money metrics provides an important external framework for testing whether those business plan assumptions are being converted into sustainable financial performance and effective use of resources. They should therefore be used not in isolation, but as part of an integrated assurance framework linking the business plan, budget, stress testing, sector benchmarking and this strategy. Taking together, this framework provides the basis for the strategic objectives that follow.
| RSH VfM metric | Link to Board-approved business plan | How it should be used |
| Operating margin | Directly linked to the business plan assumptions on operating surplus, management cost pressure, Awaab’s Law provision and delivery of planned efficiencies. | Used to test whether the planned surplus profile is being achieved and whether service and cost decisions are maintaining financial capacity. |
| EBITDA MRI interest cover | A core covenant-related measure within the business plan, stress testing and lender monitoring framework, especially given the continued focus on covenant headroom and the LGIM & Barclays carve out. | Used to assess resilience, ability to absorb shocks and whether One Manchester remains within prudent risk tolerance as assumptions change. |
| Reinvestment | Linked to the Board-approved investment programme for existing homes, fire and building safety, EPC and sustainability provision, and the approved growth programme. | Used to demonstrate whether One Manchester is investing at the level assumed in the plan and whether that investment remains affordable and strategically targeted. |
| Gearing | Directly linked to the long-term funding assumptions, borrowing requirement, peak debt profile and treasury position set out in the business plan. | Used to monitor financial capacity, balance sheet strength and how much flexibility remains to respond to future investment needs or adverse scenarios. |
| Return on capital employed | Linked to how effectively the asset base and wider capital employed are generating returns in support of One Manchester’s social purpose and financial strength. | Used to test whether major investment, asset decisions and development choices are improving long-term value rather than simply increasing spend. |
| Headline social housing cost per unit | Linked to management cost assumptions, repairs and compliance spend, service redesign work and the efficiency targets built into the business plan and SOF programme. | Used to assess whether One Manchester’s cost base is reducing, stable or increasing, and to support comparison against peers and internal trend analysis. |
| New supply delivered | Linked to the Board-approved development and regeneration programme, including the current assumption of reduced growth and prioritisation of financially viable schemes. | Used to assess whether the organisation is delivering the level of approved new homes expected from the plan and whether delivery remains aligned to financial capacity. |
These metrics should be reported alongside budget monitoring, business plan refreshes, covenant reporting, stress testing outputs and key operational performance measures so that Board can see both the financial outcome and the underlying drivers of performance. Where movement in an RSH metric reflects a strategic choice, such as higher reinvestment or temporary cost pressure from regulatory compliance, reporting should explain the rationale, expected benefit and long-term VfM impact rather than presenting the metric in isolation.
Our Strategic Priorities
Over the life of this three-year strategy, One Manchester will focus on five main objectives: improving service efficiency and productivity; improving the quality and consistency of customer outcomes; making better use of homes, assets, systems and data; improving investment and procurement decisions; and maintaining strong financial resilience to support today’s services and future priorities. These objectives will be delivered through the organisation’s strategic themes and through the practical application of the ‘Better, Faster, Cheaper’ approach, so that service improvements lead to clear financial and
operational benefits. The next section shows how these objectives will be applied across the main areas of One Manchester’s work.
How We Will Deliver Value for Money
Customers
We will: make services easier to access, more responsive and more consistent, using customer insight and performance information to focus effort where it will make the biggest difference.
Success will look like: higher tenant satisfaction, fewer complaints, quicker resolution, lower cost to serve by channel, better first contact resolution and less repeat contact.
Homes
We will: improve the way we deliver repairs, maintain compliance, understand asset performance and plan investment so that homes stay safe, warm and sustainable at the best possible long-term cost.
Success will look like: lower repairs cost per property, quicker repair completion, stronger right first time performance, continued achievement of the Decent Homes Standard, sustained compliance, faster re-let times and lower void loss.
Neighbourhoods and Communities
We will: target neighbourhood services and community investment so that we reduce avoidable demand, help customers sustain tenancies and increase social value.
Success will look like: stronger tenancy sustainment, lower arrears, quicker anti-social behaviour case resolution, fewer evictions, lower neighbourhood management cost per unit and clearer evidence of social value.
Growth and Development
We will: make sure decisions about new homes are affordable, well governed and aligned to long-term priorities, with a clear understanding of cost, return and wider benefit.
Success will look like: better control of development cost per unit, stronger scheme appraisal, improved grant leverage, closer alignment between forecast and actual outturn, delivery of social and affordable homes, and better long-term return on investment.
Sustainability
We will: improve environmental performance in ways that reduce long-term running and maintenance costs while supporting carbon reduction commitments.
Success will look like: a better average SAP or EPC profile, measurable carbon reduction, clearer benefits from energy efficiency investment, lower utility and service cost pressures, and reduced long-term maintenance costs from retrofit and planned investment.
Colleagues and Ways of Working
We will: improve productivity through better workforce planning, clearer accountability, better systems and stronger continuous improvement skills.
Success will look like: stronger productivity, lower absence, reduced agency and overtime cost, lower employee turnover where relevant, improved training completion and clear benefits from improvement activity.
Data, Digital and Transformation
We will: improve processes, automation, data quality and digital tools where these help us provide a better, faster and more efficient service.
Success will look like: higher digital take-up, more self-service transactions, shorter process times, stronger automation benefits, better data quality and less manual rework or system-related failure demand.
Finance, Procurement and Governance
We will: strengthen financial stewardship, contract management, procurement discipline and assurance so that decisions are well informed and resources are used to best effect.
Success will look like: stronger operating margin, improved EBITDA MRI interest cover, appropriate gearing and reinvestment, stronger return on capital employed, lower management cost per unit, higher procurement savings, better contract compliance and tighter budget control.
Formal VfM Metrics Table
The table below brings together the core One Manchester VfM measures that will be used to monitor delivery of this strategy.
| Theme | Metric | Definition/Purpose | Reporting Frequency |
| Customers | Tenant satisfaction | Measures overall customer satisfaction with landlord services and provides a headline indicator of perceived value and service quality. | Monthly |
| Customers | Cost to serve by channel | Tracks the relative cost of delivering services through phone, digital, face-to-face and other channels to support efficient service design. | Monthly |
| Customers | First contact resolution | Assesses the percentage of customer enquiries resolved at the first point of contact, reducing repeat demand and improving service efficiency. |
Monthly |
| Homes | Repairs cost per property | Measures the average cost of responsive repairs per home to support productivity analysis and benchmarking. | Monthly |
| Homes | Average repair completion time | Tracks how quickly repairs are completed, helping assess the balance between cost, quality and responsiveness. | Monthly |
| Homes | Void turnaround time | Measures the average time taken to re-let empty properties and indicates efficiency in void management. | Monthly |
| Neighbourhoods and Communities | Tenancy sustainment rate | Tracks the proportion of tenancies sustained, reflecting the effectiveness of tenancy support and neighbourhood management. |
Monthly |
| Neighbourhoods and Communities | Arrears as a percentage of rent debit | Measures rent arrears performance and helps assess the effectiveness and value of income collection activity. |
Monthly |
| Growth and Development | Development cost per unit | Assesses the average cost of delivering new homes and supports appraisal, benchmarking and investment decisions. | Quarterly |
| Growth and Development | Forecast versus actual scheme outturn | Measures delivery performance against approved business cases and strengthens financial control over development activity. | Quarterly |
| Sustainability | Average EPC profile | Tracks the energy performance of homes and helps assess whether investment is improving long-term asset efficiency and customer outcomes. | Quarterly |
| Sustainability | Carbon reduction performance | Measures progress against carbon reduction objectives and the long-term value delivered through environmental investment. | Annual |
| Colleagues and Ways of Working | Productivity ratio | Measures outputs relative to staffing input and helps identify whether processes and teams are operating efficiently. | Monthly |
| Colleagues and Ways of Working | Agency and overtime cost | Tracks additional workforce cost and supports review of workforce planning, resilience and efficiency. |
Monthly |
| Data, Digital and Transformation | Digital take-up | Measures the proportion of transactions completed through digital/self-service routes and supports channel shift analysis. | Monthly |
| Data, Digital and Transformation | Automation benefits realized | Measures the financial or time- saving benefits generated through automation and process redesign activity. | Monthly |
| Finance, Procurement and Governance | Operating margin | A core sector measure showing the operating surplus generated from turnover and indicating overall financial efficiency. | Monthly |
| Finance, Procurement and Governance | EBITDA MRI interest cover | Measures the organisation’s ability to cover interest payments from earnings and is a key test of financial resilience. |
Monthly |
| Finance, Procurement and Governance | Procurement savings | Tracks cashable and non- cashable savings achieved through procurement activity, contract management and commercial review. |
Monthly |
Corporate Plan and Annual Corporate Priorities
The Corporate Plan and annual Corporate Priorities provide the overarching framework within which this strategy operates. The direction of ‘Better, Faster, Cheaper’ provides the practical expression of VfM delivery, while the People, Place and Prosperity priorities contain the main service, investment and performance drivers that this strategy brings together.
| Corporate Priority | VfM Link | Example Measures |
| People | Value for money is delivered by designing services around customer need, improving accessibility, reducing service failure, supporting tenancy sustainment and investing in people and communities where this improves outcomes and prevents higher downstream cost. | Tenant sati faction, first contact resolution, repeat contact, complaints resolution time, tenancy sustainment, arrears, evictions, social value outcomes. |
| Place | Value for money is delivered by investing in safe, sustainable homes and neighbourhoods, improving asset performance, targeting repairs and planned maintenance effectively, and ensuring community and place-based activity reduces avoidable demand and protects long-term value. |
Repairs cost per property, average repair completion time, void turnaround, compliance performance, EPC profile, carbon reduction, neighbourhood management cost per unit. |
| Prosperity | Value for money is delivered by maintaining financial resilience, strengthening procurement and contract management, improving productivity, using data and digital investment effectively, and ensuring that growth and development decisions are robust, affordable and aligned to strategic priorities. | Operating margin, EBITDA MRI interest cover, return on capital employed, procurement savings, digital take-up, automation benefits realised, development cost per unit, forecast versus actual scheme outturn. |
| Better, Faster, Cheaper | This is the organisation’s practical expression of value for money. Better means improving customer outcomes and service quality, faster means reducing delay and friction in service delivery, and cheaper means improving efficiency and releasing capacity or cashable savings without undermining outcomes. | Customer satisfaction, turnaround times, cost to serve, productivity ratios, procurement savings, reduction in failure demand, budget variance control. |
Implications for Reporting and Assurance
As related strategies are refreshed; action plans and performance measures should explicitly identify the VfM contribution they are expected to make. This will help One Manchester demonstrate that value for money is being delivered through customer experience, neighbourhood, homes, sustainability, data and governance activity as well as through direct financial management. Board and Committee reporting should increasingly draw out both the service and VfM contribution of these strategies, using a common language of cost, outcome, productivity, social value and long-term impact.
Delivery Plan
This three-year strategy will be delivered through annual business planning, budget setting, service review activity and targeted improvement programmes. Each year, specific value for money actions will be identified and tracked, with clear ownership, milestones and expected benefits. These actions may include service redesign, procurement savings, contract optimisation, asset review, productivity improvements, digital enablement, reduction in failure demand, communications activity, and opportunities to improve customer outcomes at lower unit cost. Delivery will remain dynamic so that new
opportunities can be incorporated as they arise, rather than being limited only to actions identified at the start of the strategy period. The phased plan below shows how this delivery approach will be sequenced across the three-year period.
Three-Year Phased Delivery Plan
The phased delivery plan below shows how the main priorities within this strategy will be sequenced over the 2026–2029 period. It is intended to provide a practical framework for annual planning, monitoring and assurance, while allowing flexibility to respond to new opportunities, regulatory requirements and organisational priorities.
| Theme | 2026/27 - Establish and Baseline | 2027-28 Improve and embed | 2028/29 - Optimise and sustain |
| Customers | Baseline cost to serve, contact demand, complaints performance and satisfaction trends. Identify key service pain points and prioritise customer journey improvements. Develop and begin the customer- facing Better, Faster, Cheaper communications plan so customers understand what value for money means, how feedback shapes decisions and how service improvements will be communicated. |
Embed redesigned customer journeys, strengthen channel shift and improve first contact resolution through service and process changes. | Demonstrate sustained improvements in customer outcomes, reduced avoidable contact and stronger customer understanding of how Better, Faster, Cheaper is improving services. |
| Homes | Establish baseline performance for repairs, voids, compliance and asset cost. Prioritise areas of highest cost, risk or underperformance. |
Implement targeted repairs and asset improvement actions, strengthen right first time performance and improve investment decision-making. | Evidence improved asset performance, reduced lifecycle cost and sustained compliance and service productivity. |
| Neighbourhoods and Communities | Review tenancy sustainment, arrears, ASB and neighbourhood cost data to identify areas where early intervention can reduce demand and improve outcomes. |
Embed targeted neighbourhood and tenancy support interventions, improve local intelligence and align community investment to evidenced need. |
Demonstrate stronger tenancy outcomes, lower avoidable cost and clearer social value generated through neighbourhood activity. |
| Growth and Development | Review development appraisal assumptions, cost per unit and scheme governance to ensure a clear baseline for value and affordability. | Strengthen appraisal discipline, cost control and reporting across the development programme, including lessons learned from live schemes. |
Evidence stronger scheme performance, more reliable outturn forecasting and clearer long-term return from development decisions. |
| Sustainability | Establish baseline EPC, retrofit, carbon and lifecycle cost data. Prioritise investment areas with the clearest link to compliance, efficiency and long-term value. | Implement targeted sustainability and retrofit actions that improve asset performance and reduce future operating cost. |
Demonstrate measurable carbon and efficiency gains, improved asset sustainability and clearer long-term value from investment. |
| Colleagues and Ways of Working | Baseline productivity, workforce cost, absence, turnover and key process bottlenecks. Build leadership understanding of VfM expectations. Develop and launch the internal Better, Faster, Cheaper communications plan using leadership briefings, manager messages, team meetings and staff updates so that colleagues understand what value for money means in practice and how they can contribute. |
Embed productivity improvement activity, workforce planning changes and continuous improvement disciplines across services. |
Demonstrate stronger workforce productivity, reduced avoidable staffing cost and a well-understood Better, Faster, Cheaper culture across services. |
| Data, Digital and Transformation | Baseline data quality, manual effort, digital take-up and process cycle times. Identify high- volume processes suitable for redesign or automation. |
Implement digital and automation improvements, strengthen data governance and improve operational reporting quality. | Demonstrate sustained efficiency gains, improved decision quality and clearer value realised from digital and data investment. |
| Finance, Procurement and Governance | Review core VfM metrics, procurement opportunities, contract performance and budget variance trends. Confirm the governance and reporting framework. | Embed stronger procurement planning, contract management, benchmarking and value-based performance reporting. | Evidence improved financial resilience, stronger commercial outcomes and a mature VfM reporting framework. |
Building a Value for Money Culture
Value for money works best when it is part of how everyone thinks and works, not just a financial exercise. One Manchester will build value for money into leadership, team planning, performance management and day-to-day decisions. Colleagues will be encouraged to spot waste, challenge poor value, suggest improvements and use evidence to support better choices. Customers also have an important role to play by helping shape services, challenging performance and telling us what good value looks like from their perspective. Building these behaviours across the organisation will be essential if this
strategy is to lead to lasting improvement.
Better, Faster, Cheaper communications plan
To support this, One Manchester will use a simple Better, Faster, Cheaper communications plan to explain what value for money means, why it matters, and how different teams and customers can contribute. Internally, this will include leadership briefings, manager messages, team meetings, staff updates and regular reporting through existing governance routes so that expectations are clear and progress is visible. For customers, this will include clear updates through existing customer communication channels, showing how feedback has shaped decisions and how improvements are making a difference to services, homes and neighbourhoods. Communications should be practical, plain English and linked to real examples of improvement, so that value for money is seen as part of everyday service delivery rather than a technical finance message.
How We Will Measure Success
Progress will be monitored through monthly operational reporting, quarterly Board reporting, annual self-assessment, sector benchmarking and thematic performance review. The tables in this strategy set out the core measures and reporting cadence that will be used to judge progress. An annual value for money update will summarise achievements, challenges, benchmarking insights and priorities for the following year.
In Summary
This strategy makes clear that value for money is about more than cost. It is about using our resources well so that we can provide better services, maintain strong finances and deliver lasting benefits for customers and communities. By linking value for money to our corporate priorities, customer outcomes and long-term sustainability, One Manchester will be better placed to make good decisions, keep improving and ensure that every pound spent delivers as much value as possible.